telebookstall

We often hear people say this phrase. I think there is no need to put talking and doing together. Talking is a description of the expected state of things. It tends to express the purpose of something or a vague outline. Doing is the realization of one's desired goal after an event. For example, when a person says they want to do good deeds, actually doing good deeds are two different concepts. People often compare talking and doing together to escape from the preaching of others or to deny the effectiveness of what others say. For instance, if a person talks all day about doing good deeds and hopes to gain some reputation, others may use this to expose their hypocrisy. It is indeed easier to talk than to do. However, if talking is elevated to a theoretical description of realization, talking and doing are not contradictory. This also avoids external factors such as contempt and bragging, making it easier to reach consensus. Therefore, a theory must have a methodology, such as being able to "do" what is "talked about." Just like a well-written program can run. So, methodology is worth considering. A theory that demonstrates methodology is also sincere.